1. Daiker argues that it is important that we offer positive feedback to our students to help build their confidence. Do you have any strategies when grading papers that forces you to provide more praise to your students?
2. Elbow discusses that there is a difference between ranking and evaluating student writing, and he argues that evaluating is a better practice as providing a quantitative rank of writing is often unreliable. How do you plan on focusing on evaluation more so than standard ranking in your composition classroom?
Welcome! This blog acts as a space for you to critically reflect on the readings and better absorb the material, and it puts you in conversation with your peers about their understanding of the material. Directions: 1: Create a new post where you will raise two questions about the readings that you would like your peers to engage with. 2: Reply to one peer's post as a comment and attempt to answer one of their posted questions. Blog posts are due by 8pm the night before class.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yon's questions for July26
Q 1. According to Reiff, the genre can be interpreted in the context of a power dynamic. Used to a genre convention, however, readers often...
-
1) In Bartholomae’s essay, he presents the argument that criticism is an essential element of a composition curriculum and the revision proc...
-
1. On page 161, Reiff says that "Students' critical awareness of how genres work—their understanding of how rhetorical features ar...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.