1. Say you decide to use portfolio grading, would you want it to be more of a revised compilation of a student's writing from your course in totality, or as a curation of only their strongest works? (What are your thoughts on portfolios in terms of design choices?)
2. If we are understanding genre as contingent on context, where we investigate it with certain analytical lenses, how would you go about explaining this understanding to your ENC 2135 class in a way they can easily comprehend and begin to utilize?
Welcome! This blog acts as a space for you to critically reflect on the readings and better absorb the material, and it puts you in conversation with your peers about their understanding of the material. Directions: 1: Create a new post where you will raise two questions about the readings that you would like your peers to engage with. 2: Reply to one peer's post as a comment and attempt to answer one of their posted questions. Blog posts are due by 8pm the night before class.
Wednesday, July 25, 2018
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yon's questions for July26
Q 1. According to Reiff, the genre can be interpreted in the context of a power dynamic. Used to a genre convention, however, readers often...
-
1) In Bartholomae’s essay, he presents the argument that criticism is an essential element of a composition curriculum and the revision proc...
-
1. On page 161, Reiff says that "Students' critical awareness of how genres work—their understanding of how rhetorical features ar...
Hi John,
ReplyDeleteTo answer your first question, if I use portfolio grading, I think it will be more of a revised compilation of the totality of students' writing. If I only collect their strongest works, I won't really get a sense of how much they've grown. As much of the point of a portfolio is to inspire reflection on how our composition practices and identities as writers have evolved, I think a more comprehensive collection of work is necessary.