1. Sommers argues that "students have strategies for handling words and phrases and their strategies helped them on a word or sentence level. What they lack, however, is a set of strategies to help them identify the 'something larger' that they sensed was wrong and work from there" (Sommers, 80). How can we teach our students strategies to identify the "something larger" that Sommers refers to? Do you think it would be possible to change the way that our students view revision in just a semester?
2. In her chapter on teaching grammar, Bishop argues that students are often uncertain what revision entails. She writes that, "we found also that simply assigning 'a revision,' or multiple drafts did not clarify the process for students" and most students implemented "a linear and unitary sense of writing" (Bishop, 178). How do you plan on explaining the revision process to your students so that they understand that it is supposed to be a recursive part of their writing process?
Welcome! This blog acts as a space for you to critically reflect on the readings and better absorb the material, and it puts you in conversation with your peers about their understanding of the material. Directions: 1: Create a new post where you will raise two questions about the readings that you would like your peers to engage with. 2: Reply to one peer's post as a comment and attempt to answer one of their posted questions. Blog posts are due by 8pm the night before class.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yon's questions for July26
Q 1. According to Reiff, the genre can be interpreted in the context of a power dynamic. Used to a genre convention, however, readers often...
-
1. After reading Arola’s article and taking into consideration the eight-year time lapse, would you agree or disagree that ...
-
1. Reiff stresses an importance for instructors to move beyond simply teaching genre as form. For one, if we teach genre as simply a templat...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.