1 – In Portfolios in the
Writing Classroom: A Final Reflection Kathleen Yancey says that “teachers
will read not so much to see how their students are developing or to suggest
new directions, but to assess, to assign value (Purves 1984). In this
situation, teachers' reading of and response to text are directed in large
part, first, toward providing such an evaluation and, second, toward providing
a justification of the reading and of the assigned grade” (111). Do you agree
with her assessment of the effect that responding for evaluative purposes can
have on a teacher’s responsive priorities? If possible, draw on your own
experiences. If you think she is correct, do you think there are ways other
than portfolio grading that can prevent this?
2 – In her
pedagogical insight essay, Mary Joe Reif says that “Approaching writing through
a contextual genre theory consists of using genre as a lens for accessing,
understanding, and
writing in various situations and contexts. A genre approach to teaching
writing is careful not to treat genres as static forms or systems of
classification. Rather, students learn how to recognize
genres as rhetorical
responses to and reflections of the situations in which they are used” (159).
What are some of the approaches that you might take as a teacher to avoid teaching
genre as a static form? If possible, provide an example of a less that you
might employ.