1. What is your experience with assemblage/remix assignments, whether as student or instructor?
2. What's your reaction to the idea of writing as action or effect in context rather than performance? Does that match your view of writing? Or do you have a few entirely outside of that supposed binary?
Welcome! This blog acts as a space for you to critically reflect on the readings and better absorb the material, and it puts you in conversation with your peers about their understanding of the material. Directions: 1: Create a new post where you will raise two questions about the readings that you would like your peers to engage with. 2: Reply to one peer's post as a comment and attempt to answer one of their posted questions. Blog posts are due by 8pm the night before class.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yon's questions for July26
Q 1. According to Reiff, the genre can be interpreted in the context of a power dynamic. Used to a genre convention, however, readers often...
-
1. After reading Arola’s article and taking into consideration the eight-year time lapse, would you agree or disagree that ...
-
1. Reiff stresses an importance for instructors to move beyond simply teaching genre as form. For one, if we teach genre as simply a templat...
Hi Noah,
ReplyDeleteI find my own experience with creative writing close to the assemblage/remix assignments. In my own experience, I have followed the form and style of many poets to shape my own poems, while citing or attributing direct lines. Not only is imitation encouraged in art, it can be seen as inspiration or influence. I feel this is a broader and more positive way to approach writing as it puts less stress on originality, and regards the act of writing as shaped by a community, whether literal or metaphoric. That is not to say that issues of ownership do not persist among writers and artists, but I feel that the experience definitely helped reevaluate myths about originality and the lone writer persistent in academia.