1. What are some challenges/fears you are facing when it comes to devising your strategy for grading? What are some potential ways (perhaps new things you 'borrowed' [plagiarized] from the readings) to assuage these challenges/fears?
Personally, I've been thinking a lot about how I will be including revision into my grading in a way that doesn't scream "extra credit" so I've been considering doing something with conferences or portfolio grading, though I am still unsure.
2. Did you agree with Elbow's "bottom-line" grading (H and U)? To me it seems sort of a strange half/quarter-measure, like normal grading without a midsection, but maybe I'm just not getting it.
Welcome! This blog acts as a space for you to critically reflect on the readings and better absorb the material, and it puts you in conversation with your peers about their understanding of the material. Directions: 1: Create a new post where you will raise two questions about the readings that you would like your peers to engage with. 2: Reply to one peer's post as a comment and attempt to answer one of their posted questions. Blog posts are due by 8pm the night before class.
Monday, July 23, 2018
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yon's questions for July26
Q 1. According to Reiff, the genre can be interpreted in the context of a power dynamic. Used to a genre convention, however, readers often...
-
1) In Bartholomae’s essay, he presents the argument that criticism is an essential element of a composition curriculum and the revision proc...
-
1. On page 161, Reiff says that "Students' critical awareness of how genres work—their understanding of how rhetorical features ar...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.