1) Darker writes, "[P]raise, however beneficial as a remedy for apprehension and as a motivator of student writing, is more easily enjoined than put into practice ... [Dragga] concludes that teacher training must emphasize explicit criteria for praiseworthy grading. The title of this article implies that praise does not flow readily from the marking pens of writing teachers; it must be learned" (156). What do you think this training would look like for instructors? Do you think your writing background up until this point has prepared you to evaluate in a manner that emphasizes what's going right in the writing?
2) Did any of these readings cause you to relate more as a student who still has their writing evaluated and graded than the intended audience of an instructor?
Welcome! This blog acts as a space for you to critically reflect on the readings and better absorb the material, and it puts you in conversation with your peers about their understanding of the material. Directions: 1: Create a new post where you will raise two questions about the readings that you would like your peers to engage with. 2: Reply to one peer's post as a comment and attempt to answer one of their posted questions. Blog posts are due by 8pm the night before class.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yon's questions for July26
Q 1. According to Reiff, the genre can be interpreted in the context of a power dynamic. Used to a genre convention, however, readers often...
-
1. After reading Arola’s article and taking into consideration the eight-year time lapse, would you agree or disagree that ...
-
1. Reiff stresses an importance for instructors to move beyond simply teaching genre as form. For one, if we teach genre as simply a templat...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.