Wednesday, June 27, 2018

Raquel Hollman June 28 Qs

1. In Bartholomae, Lobin, and Fulkerson's texts, the reader is presented with both progressive and old-school methods of teaching composition and grading papers. Which do you find yourself prescribing more to and why?

2. What are some things that you liked about the WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition? What are some things you disliked? How can you compare and/or contrast the objectives listed in this text to some of the concepts presented in the three other articles for this weeks readings?
at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Yon's questions for July26

Q 1. According to Reiff, the genre can be interpreted in the context of a power dynamic. Used to a genre convention, however, readers often...

  • Laura Smith Questions, 6/27
    1) In Bartholomae’s essay, he presents the argument that criticism is an essential element of a composition curriculum and the revision proc...
  • Nicholas - 7/26
    1. On page 161, Reiff says that "Students' critical awareness of how genres work—their understanding of how rhetorical features ar...