1. In Tobin's work, he references Elbow's Writing with Power which notes the distinction and arguably the conflict between creating and criticizing. How might these two skills be at odds with one another? Is there a time when these processes work hand in hand rather than being in conflict with one another?
2. Tobin notes (p. 11) that as process approaches to pedagogy gained prominence, they fell victim to the regimentation of the preprocess approaches that came before them. Is it possible to form a theory of teaching writing that does not become so regimented? If so, how? Is this regimentation a natural bi-product of the process by which we disseminate information?
Welcome! This blog acts as a space for you to critically reflect on the readings and better absorb the material, and it puts you in conversation with your peers about their understanding of the material. Directions: 1: Create a new post where you will raise two questions about the readings that you would like your peers to engage with. 2: Reply to one peer's post as a comment and attempt to answer one of their posted questions. Blog posts are due by 8pm the night before class.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yon's questions for July26
Q 1. According to Reiff, the genre can be interpreted in the context of a power dynamic. Used to a genre convention, however, readers often...
-
1) In Bartholomae’s essay, he presents the argument that criticism is an essential element of a composition curriculum and the revision proc...
-
1. On page 161, Reiff says that "Students' critical awareness of how genres work—their understanding of how rhetorical features ar...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.