1. Straub
Straub listed a few examples of how feedback is given. We can always say we won't be a harsh critic, or we'll go easy in the classroom, but that is not always the case. In the classroom, do you think that you will be a harsher critic than most or more positive, or even a mixture of both?
2.
Belanoff states that "such reliance on grades presumes that the student who gets an A has learned more than the student who gets a B and so on down the line. I have to disagree with this statement, as a number of factors come into play when grades are concerned. Do you agree or disagree?
Welcome! This blog acts as a space for you to critically reflect on the readings and better absorb the material, and it puts you in conversation with your peers about their understanding of the material. Directions: 1: Create a new post where you will raise two questions about the readings that you would like your peers to engage with. 2: Reply to one peer's post as a comment and attempt to answer one of their posted questions. Blog posts are due by 8pm the night before class.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yon's questions for July26
Q 1. According to Reiff, the genre can be interpreted in the context of a power dynamic. Used to a genre convention, however, readers often...
-
1) In Bartholomae’s essay, he presents the argument that criticism is an essential element of a composition curriculum and the revision proc...
-
Q 1. According to Reiff, the genre can be interpreted in the context of a power dynamic. Used to a genre convention, however, readers often...
Hi Farrah,
ReplyDeleteI'd like to be casual with my students, but my experience in creative writing workshops has taught me that I can be very vocally critical when it comes to the writing of others. I do think finding a balance is a good idea because I don't want to sacrifice all of my authority (especially if a student's essay has serious issues) but I don't want to intimidate or discourage my students from seeking to improve. Hopefully I can straddle that line gracefully.
HI Farrah,
ReplyDeleteThe question of Belanoff's position on grades is an interesting one. While it makes complete sense for class grades to be made of a multitude of things I wonder if we can apply his idea to individual assignments or papers. While papers clearly have a combination of things that are part of their make up (as can be seen in rubrics) the design of a rubric is largely to allocate points on the basis of testing if a student has learned what you want them to. That's why in literature classes I have seen rubrics that offer much more points for analysis than an essay's structure or mechanics combined. In that case, I think that its safe to say that I've designed an assignment in which I offer more points to students who are able to prove that they have learned the things that I want them to.
However, I think you are also right when I consider that my own grading practices tend to privilege growth when awarding those points over pure execution. I'm much more interested in seeing my students improve than I am punishing them for not living up to arbitrary standards from the beginning of class. In that case you could consider their grad to be a combination of performance and expectation.